mirror of
https://github.com/olehomelchenko/chart-sins.git
synced 2026-08-08 02:22:43 +00:00
18e7f30b2d
The pie page argued the form was the problem ("asks the reader to
compare angles") and then conceded a narrow exception; the dual-axis
page named the form in its title and rated it severity 5. Both read as
blanket bans, which is not the position — and blanket bans are how
dataviz advice turns into the folklore we're trying to replace with
citations.
The pie page now says outright that the chart type isn't the sin, the
workload is, and keeps the pie for the job it does well. The dual-axis
page is retitled for the actual misuse, drops to severity 4, and gains
a section on when a second axis is legitimate — the test being whether
you chose the alignment yourself.
Adds a severity rubric to CLAUDE.md so this stays consistent: 5 is
reserved for charts with no honest reading, and a form with legitimate
uses caps at 4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ULE5RRxdQE1ebwefEd2eCM
7.5 KiB
7.5 KiB
Chart Sins — working notes
Conventions and gotchas for anyone (human or agent) working in this repo. Keep this current when a convention changes.
What this is
Chart Sins is "nohello.net for bad charts." The unit of value is a single, linkable, cited page you send someone instead of re-explaining, for the hundredth time, why their chart misleads. The gallery is secondary; the per-sin page is the product.
Each sin page follows one shape: poke → proof → why → the fix → receipts → share.
Voice & content conventions
- The title names the problem plainly; the poke carries the voice. A title is a label someone scans in the gallery and recognizes in a link — write "Truncated Y-Axis on a Bar Chart," not "The Truncated Temptation." Use the field's standard term for the sin where one exists. Save the wit for the poke; that's what it's for.
- The poke names the general sin, never the sample's specifics. A visitor didn't "start the axis at 90" — they mis-set the baseline. Write "Your bars don't start at zero…", not the numbers from our example data.
- Tone: cheeky, not moralizing. "Caught — here are the receipts," not "repent." Poke the mistake, keep it light.
- We condemn uses, not chart types. There is no banned form here. A pie chart showing three parts of a whole is doing its job; a second y-axis carrying °C against °F is fine. The sin is always a use — the workload the form can't carry, the alignment you picked yourself, the baseline you moved. Say so on the page when the form has honest uses, so nobody reads us as "pie charts are always wrong." Blanket bans are how dataviz advice turns into folklore, and folklore is what we're trying to replace with citations.
- Severity means something. Keep it consistent: 5 — reverses or fabricates meaning; no honest reading of the chart exists. 4 — actively misleads about magnitude or relationship, but the underlying form has legitimate uses. 3 — a sound form asked to do a job it can't; the reader can't extract what the chart claims to show. 2 — craft failure: nothing false, but the reader is made to work for no reason.
- Same numbers, both charts. The bad and fixed charts must share one dataset so the page proves dishonest-vs-honest by construction. Charts are authored as Vega-Lite specs and rendered at build time — never screenshots.
- The bad chart is intentionally wrong; the fixed chart must obey the rules.
(e.g. the dual-axis "sin" deliberately breaks the one-axis rule; its fix uses
separate honest panels.) When picking chart colors or building a new chart,
run the
datavizskill and validate the palette with its validator. - Citations are core, and generous. Every sin cites sources
(
src/lib/references.ts) under "Don't take our word for it." Don't invent authority — point at it, and point at as much of it as you honestly can. Five-ish sources per sin is normal; a reader who distrusts one author should find another in the list they don't. Adding a new reference is routine, not an editorial event — the file is a bibliography to grow, not a canon to curate, and coverage of it is not a goal in itself. Never stretch a source to fit: if it doesn't actually make the claim, cite one that does or leave it out. Getting an attribution wrong costs more than a thinner page. A source that complicates our position (Kosara on pie charts, Datawrapper's second thoughts on dual axes) is worth citing too — say so in the note. - Internal build decisions stay out of visitor-facing content and the DOM.
The design system (Carbon), the typeface (IBM Plex), and the inspiration
(nohello.net) are engineering choices — they must not appear in page copy,
the footer, meta tags, or CSS class names on the public site. (They were
scrubbed once already; keep them out.) Naming them here, in repo docs, is
fine. "Canon" is on that list too — it's our internal shorthand for the
reference list; the site says "References" and links to
/references/.
Adding a sin
- Author two Vega-Lite specs in
src/charts/, e.g.my-sin-bad.jsonandmy-sin-fixed.json. Same underlying data in both. Omit$schema/config; explicitwidth/heightare fine. The bad one breaks a rule on purpose; the fixed one is correct. - Add
src/content/sins/my-sin.mdwith frontmatter (schema insrc/content.config.ts):title, summary, poke, category, severity (1–5), tags[], badChart, fixedChart, date, draft, citations: [{ key, note }]badChart/fixedChartare the spec basenames (no.json).citations[].keymust exist insrc/lib/references.ts(build throws otherwise). - New reference? Add it once to
src/lib/references.ts, then cite its key. npm run devand check. The OG card for the sin is generated automatically.
Design & rendering
- Astro 5, static output, zero client JS — the one exception is the small progressive-enhancement copy-link script on the sin page.
- Styling is a token layer (
src/styles/global.css) built on Carbon design tokens: layered light/dark themes, 8px spacing scale, IBM Plex (self-hosted via@fontsource), square geometry, a 2px focus ring. Class prefix issite-(notcds-). - Charts render to static SVG at build via the shared pipeline in
src/lib/renderChart.ts(used by both the on-page component and the OG generator, so they stay identical). Charts sit on a fixed light canvas (--chart-canvas) in both themes so the single baked SVG keeps AA contrast. - The categorical palette is Carbon's data-vis palette, validated for colorblind-safety/contrast on the chart surface. Re-validate if you change it.
OpenGraph cards
- Per-sin 1200×630 cards are generated at build time — no browser.
src/lib/og.tscomposes withsatori, rasterizes with@resvg/resvg-js; endpoints aresrc/pages/og/[slug].png.tsandog/default.png.ts. - Card content stays lean: poke + before/after charts + severity + category. No citation list on the card (that lives on the page).
- Fonts: three IBM Plex TTF weights are committed under
src/og/fonts/(satori and resvg need real font files; the@fontsourcewoff2 won't do). - satori gotchas (all learned the hard way): empty
<div>s in a flex row each need their owndisplay:flex; don't put a quotedfont-familyin an inlinestyle(it breaks the style parse — set the default font via satori'sfontsinstead); trim the markup so there's a single root node; give<img>dimensions in thestyleas px; cap charts by height so tall vconcat charts don't overflow.
Deploy & ops
- GitHub Pages via
.github/workflows/deploy.yml, triggered on push tomain(plusworkflow_dispatch). Project path is configured inastro.config.mjs(site+base→/chart-sins). - Known gotcha — the default branch. The repo's default branch is currently
the feature branch (it was the first branch pushed into the empty repo). The
auto-created
github-pagesenvironment only allows deploys from the default branch, so a push tomainbuilds but the deploy job is rejected. Until this is fixed we deploy by dispatching the workflow on the default branch. Fix: set the default branch tomain(Settings → General); then plain pushes tomaindeploy normally and this note can go away. - Pages had to be enabled manually once (Settings → Pages → Source: GitHub Actions) — the Actions token can't create the Pages site itself.